A la vista de lo complicado que es demostrar la neutralidad mediante offsets o certificados renovables, en este artículo de MIT TR nos cuentan un enfoque alternativo, que pretende maximizar las reducciones efectivas aunque no necesariamente lleven a la neutralidad:
Instead of trying to cancel out every ongoing ton of emissions, a company might pick a percentage of its revenue or set a defensible carbon price on those tons, and then dedicate all that money toward achieving the maximum climate benefit the money can buy, says Libby Blanchard, a research scholar at the University of Cambridge. (She coauthored the paper on the contribution model with Barbara Haya of the University of California, Berkeley, and Bill Anderegg at the University of Utah.)
Relacionado, los problemas de Running Tide.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario